Monday, August 31, 2009

The Day of the [Theatre] Amateur

~~~~
In 2007, Gary Garrison, executive director~creative affairs of the Dramatists Guild of America, wrote:
Most of our countries greatest dramatists, lyricists, composers, and librettists never had a formal education in their discipline. \\ The Dramatist, July/August 2007:G2 (GuildWorks)
What a fascinating observation and confession by a theatre professional!—especially in this world that seems obsessed with certifying capability by way of university degrees and specializations. But it brings to mind the 1971 essay by Hugh Nibley entitled “The Day of the Amateur”:
… Someone (this writer, in fact) has said that anyone can become a dean, a professor, a department head, a chancellor, or a custodian by appointment—it has happened thousands of times; but since the world began, no one has ever become an artist, a scientist, or a scholar by appointment. The professional may be a dud, but to get any recognition, the amateur has to be good. To maintain his amateur status, moreover, he has to be dedicated, honest, and incorruptible—from which irksome necessity the professional, unless he cares otherwise, is freed by an official certificate.

Do Americans have to apologize for generations of ingenious amateurs from Franklin to Ford, who fathered their modern technology? Or for Ives and Carpenter, their best composers? [etc, etc.] ...

Of course there has always been protest from the professional side: ... Emerson, "the wisest American," was banned from the campus of Harvard for his famous "American Scholar" address, which proclaimed that one did not have to be a professional to be a true thinker and scholar. ...

Not long ago one of the world’s greatest violinists was barred from the music faculty of a west-coast university solely because he did not have a degree, ...

(Hugh Nibley, “The Day of the Amateur,” New Era, Jan. 1971, 42-44. Reprinted in Brother Brigham Challenges the Saints, edited by Don E. Norton and Shirley S. Ricks [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1994], 303-304.)
Which brings us back to the h.o.p.e. and vision of NPForum. Sometimes we amateur dramatists, lyricists, composers, and librettists think our helpmates in theatre production need to be professionals in order to give our works the best possible presentation/production. Then, because the access to and cost of those professionals is beyond our means, we waste energy and years in frustrated non-production. But artistic gifts are not doled out with BFA or MFA degrees, so perhaps it is a form of denying the gifts of God when we overlook or discount the talent of local amateurs (actors, directors, designers, etc.) as we wait for artistic professionals to “bless” our works. That is not to say that many professionals are not gifted, or that “amateur” gifts cannot be immeasurably improved with education, study, and training. But, it is to say, that in our local communities, we may have amateurs who gifts are equal to, perhaps even surpassing, those of the highly trained.

Thus, the hope is that local amateurs on every level will feel inspired by the mission of NPForum to develop, express, and honor their gifts and that playwrights will have confidence to look to the gifts of God in others, whether designated amateur or professional.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Another Voice in the Theatre Wilderness

(A few excerpts from Eric Samuelsen, Assistant Professor of Theatre and Film at Brigham Young University, "Whither Mormon Drama? Look First To a Theatre," BYU Studies, vol. 35 (1995), Number 1--1995 .)

... Given this remarkably supportive history [of early church leaders for theatre], LDS playwrights have in recent decades begun to entertain thoughts of creating a more substantial body of dramatic literature. In fact, this dream of a Mormon drama was prophesied by Elder Orson F. Whitney, who talked of the coming of a "Mormon Shakespeare" and spoke of a dramatic literature "whose top shall touch heaven,"[1] a prophecy which has been echoed by Elder Boyd K. Packer, President Spencer W. Kimball,[2] and others. As a result, a number of Mormon writers and scholars—myself included—have dared to share the hope that someday we will be able to point with pride to plays of genuine substance and interest, written by and perhaps, but not necessarily, about Mormons; plays which unapologetically demonstrate the richness and profundity of the teachings of our prophets, while honestly and forthrightly exploring elements of our culture which fall short of those teachings. We hope in time to have a drama with sufficient universality and power to become as much a part of the canon of world drama as the plays of Sophocles, Shakespeare, or Shaw, or, perhaps more accurately, we hope that as the canon expands, room will be found in it for plays with Mormonism at their center, as, in fact, Elder Whitney’s prophesy suggests. With characteristic Mormon optimism, we have managed to cling to the hope, in the face of all existing evidence, that such a drama will someday be written and performed. …

… Certainly, the Mormon Shakespeare will come in God’s good time; we must have patience, and we must continue to hope. But we must also begin doing what we can to prepare the way for future genius. Perhaps we must serve in the role of artistic Eliases [emphasis added by SMS] for the Shakespeare who will come. Yet, when I look at the question of building a Mormon drama today, I feel a greater sense of urgency than ever before. As the Church moves into greater prominence in American and world society, I am convinced that we, as a people and a culture, must begin defining ourselves dramatically. …

Once again, drama—an art form that is unusually indicative of culture—remains the poor stepchild of Mormon letters. And so we must ask the question, Why have none of the writers who have shown promise in drama ever progressed beyond mere potential? I am convinced that the fault lies neither in a lack of talent nor in an excess of religiosity. Rather, our best writers in this field have, in my view, suffered from the lack of a sustaining theatrical environment in which they could flourish. …

What such playwrights need is a theater. The great eras of the world’s dramatic literature have tended to come after the establishment of theaters and theatre companies sufficiently robust to support them. Further, those theaters have always been subsidized to some degree—either financially underwritten or politically supported—and the reality is that the need for such subsidies is greater now than ever. In short, we will never develop a satisfying Mormon drama until we have established and supported a theater from which such drama might emerge. The Mormon Shakespeare needs a Mormon Globe. …

The dream of a Mormon drama must be realized step by step, line upon line. If that dream is to become a reality, we must do more than simply write plays, sponsor contests, or deliver papers—although those are helpful steps. Efforts must first be concentrated on the immediate task at hand: the building of an audience, the building of a theatre. Years from now, when a Mormon drama does arise, it will not only articulate, but also constructively transform Mormon culture. It will be a drama of prophetic power and courage. If a Mormon drama is not created within the household of faith, the dramatic role of Mormonism will remain a bit part oddly cast on the stages of strangers and foreigners.
-----------------
[1] Boyd K. Packer, "That All May Be Edified" (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1982), 276
[2] See, for example, Edward L. Kimball, ed., The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1982), 393.


Thursday, August 27, 2009

Theatre of the Good

(In 2000 & 2001, Douglas Abel, a drama educator and playwright living in Ft. McMurray, Alberta, wrote two Soliloquy columns for Theatre Alberta News which he entitled “Theatre of the Good.” Here are a some thought-provoking excerpts from his columns:)

[Theatre of the Good] involves the conviction that theatre can, and must, do good for people and for the world, that it must strive to make both better. Theatre can be used for trivial, frivolous or even harmful purposes. It should be used to promote the good in all its forms. That purpose comprises its link to the divine, and comes, somehow, from the same spiritual sources that drive the best “religious” impulses. Theatre people are missionaries because they are doing the same essential work as those who spread “the word.”

… Theatre of the Good does not eliminate comedy, entertainment, enjoyment, mischief, wonder or plain fun. It does give all these things a purpose, as well as a standard against which both day-to-day and long-term work can be judged. It provides a benchmark for deciding what work should be chosen for performance, and how it should be performed.

Theatre of the Good need not consist merely of problem plays, tragedies and biting social criticism. It can provide escape and relief from everyday cares, can mock, criticize, laugh with or laugh at. But it does all these things with core questions in mind: how does this work serve, in whatever way, to improve the people it affects? What does it give them that will make them, and the world they live in, better as a result of their experience? If the answer is that the particular work will not produce some kind of potential “benefit”, some kind of “making of good,” then Theatre of the Good will respond, “Better then, to do something else.” It reminds us that it is not enough just to fill seats, and that theatre is not just a business—or that its business is not just commercial. (Theatre Alberta News, Winter 2000/2001:3)

Theatre of the Good tells the truth. … It presents works of imagination that are firmly grounded upon accurate perceptions and expressions of the truth of human existence.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Prophetic Voices

~~~~
Boyd K. Packer:
Elder Orson F. Whitney said:
“We shall yet have Miltons and Shakespeares of our own. God’s ammunition is not exhausted. His highest spirits are held in reserve for the latter times. In God’s name and by His help we will build up a literature whose tops will touch the heaven,though its foundation may now be low on the earth.”
Since that statement was made in 1888, those foundations have been raised up very slowly. The greatest poems are not yet written, nor the paintings finished. The greatest hymns and anthems of the Restoration are yet to be composed. The sublimest renditions of them are yet to be conducted. We move forward much slower than need be, and I would like to underline some things that stand in our way.

You will quickly notice that I refer frequently to music. There is a reason for that. We use it more often. But the point that I shall make about the musician applies to all the arts: painting, poetry, drama, dance, and others. …

For the most part, we do without [using more creative works] because the conductor wants to win the acclaim of the world. He does not play to the Lord, but to other musicians. The composer and the arranger want to please the world. The painter wants to be in style. And so our resources of art and music grow ever so gradually. And we find that there have marched through this grand parade of mortality men and women who were sublimely gifted, but who spent all, or most, in the world and for the world. And I repeat that they may well one day come to learn that “many men struggle to reach the top of the ladder, only to find that it is leaning against the wrong wall.”

It is a mistake to assume that one can follow the ways of the world and then somehow, in a moment of intruded inspiration, compose a great anthem of the Restoration, or in a moment of singular inspiration paint the great painting. When it is done; it will be done by one who has yearned and tried and longed fervently to do it, not by one who has condescended to do it. It will take quite as much preparation and work as any masterpiece, and a different kind of inspiration.

There is a test you might apply if you are among the gifted. Ask yourself this question: When I am free to do what I really want to do, what will it be?

If you find that you are ashamed of our humble heritage in the arts, that ought to be something of a signal to you. Often artists are not free to create what they most desire because the market demands other things of them. But what about when you are free? …

There is much to be said for a great effort to rediscover the humble and inspired contributions of gifted Saints of the past and thereby inspire the gifted in our day to produce works that will inspire those who come after us.

It is sad but true that, almost as a rule, our most gifted members are drawn to the world. They who are most capable to preserve our cultural heritage and to extend it, because of the enticements of the world, seek rather to replace it. That is so easy to do because for the most part they do not have that intent. They think that what they do is to improve it. Unfortunately many of them will live to learn that indeed, “Many men struggle to climb to reach the top of the ladder, only to find that it is leaning against the wrong wall.”

I mentioned earlier that the greatest hymns and anthems have not been composed, nor have the greatest illustrations been set down, nor the poems written, nor the paintings finished. When they are produced, who will produce them? Will it be the most talented and the most highly trained among us? I rather think it will not. They will be produced by those who are the most inspired among us. Inspiration can come to those whose talents are barely adequate, and their contribution will be felt for generations; and the Church and kingdom of God will move forward just a little more easily because they have been here. …

Go to, then, you who are gifted; cultivate your gift. Develop it in any of the arts and in every worthy example of them. If you have the ability and the desire, seek a career or employ your talent as an avocation or cultivate it as a hobby. But in all ways bless others with it. Set a standard of excellence. Employ it in the secular sense to every worthy advantage, but never use it profanely. Never express your gift unworthily. Increase our spiritual heritage in music, in art, in literature, in dance, in drama. …

When we have done it our activities will be a standard to the world. And our worship and devotion will remain as unique from the world as the Church is different from the world. Let the use of your gift be an expression of your devotion to Him who has given it to you. We who do not share in it will set a high standard of expectation: “For of him unto whom much is given much is required.” (D&C 82:3.) \\ Boyd K. Packer, “The Arts and the Spirit of the Lord,” Ensign, Aug. 1976, 61, 63-5
------------------------------
Neal A. Maxwell:
Beauty and truth are all about us, beckoning us to respond. But perspiration usually precedes inspiration, and pondering, reverentially, almost always occurs before we make any breakthrough. Creative work is sweet, but it is work!

… And all others who feel creative stirrings within themselves should begin the journey of a lifetime in partnership with God, who significantly has accepted as one of His designations the title of “Creator.”

… While true creativity is something that can be shared by those who appreciate the works of creation, true creativity does not depend entirely for its satisfactions upon “consumers.” It is a highly personal experience in which we are grateful to the Lord for helping us to see beauty and truth and the order of things, for restructuring our understanding of things, if necessary, to accord with things “as they really are” (Jacob 4:13). Creative experience is intrinsically satisfying. Then whatsoever appreciation comes from others for one’s efforts—such an added blessing!

The greater our sensitivity to the Spirit, the greater our response to beauty, grace, and truth in all their forms as these exist about us. …

There is so much to see and so much to celebrate righteously. Indeed, appreciation for the world (and all in it) which God has given us is but a prelude to adoration of the God who has so gloriously displayed His creativity for us. Creativity permits us to see the wondrous order of things, their infinite beauty, their scope, but also their incredible detail. To use the words of Moses, we then see and feel things which we “never had supposed” (Moses 1:10)! \\ “Creativity,” New Era, Aug. 1982, 6-7
--------------------
M. Russel Ballard:
God’s purpose for the artist is to inspire, to give us visions of ourselves that we might not otherwise see, to make us better than we would have been. The world is better for the arts and righteous artists in it. In the quest to achieve greatness in artistic pursuits—whether in painting, dance, music, drama, film, sculpture, or the written word—we should always seek first to achieve God’s purposes. “All great art is the expression of man’s delight in God’s work, not his own,” said John Ruskin, the great nineteenth-century English art critic. \\ “Filling the World with Goodness and Truth,” Ensign, July 1996, 10
------

Also see, Spencer W. Kimball, "Education for Eternity," given at the annual faculty workshop at Brigham Young University on September 12, 1967, when Spencer W. Kimball was a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.,
http://avp.byu.edu/pages/educationeternity.html

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Faith & Forum Disclosures:


The writer of this blog is of the Christian faith, but believes that God inspires and sustains people of all beliefs who are striving to make the world a better place. And though the seeds of MV-NPForum (see August 22, 2009 post) were stirred because of the large number of scripts languishing in the LDS community (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, aka Mormons), the author of this blog & creator of MV-NPForum intends that as time progresses, NPForum will become a venue for any script that reflects NPForum’s mission statement.

NPForum is not intended as a venue for elaborate productions. It has neither the budget nor other resources. Rather, think of NPForum as the Craftsman answer to the Baroque/Gothic nature of many latter-day spectaculars. NPForum doesn’t do complicated, exotic sets. If your piece requires them, you will have to wait for a larger elaborate production, though NPForum will do what it can to get you ready, if your script is chosen for NPD.) Thus, NPForum is intended as a place where quality readings, workshops, and moderate productions can help playwrights enlarge and refine (if needful) their vision and where other theatre enthusiasts can hone and share their gifts and skills.

The sidebar “Relevant Quotes” & the “Noteable Quotes” post that follows this, reflect the theatre-view of NPForum’s founder. Hope, optimism, edifying, etc. do not preclude dealing with difficult issues and crises of faith, hope, and charity. These happen in our lives every day. What NPForum wishes to avoid is the glorifying of ego and the romanticizing or superficializing of life. What it wishes to explore is mankind in search of the good, the true, and the beautiful. In the words of Brigham Young:
Can we not even make the stage of a theatre the platform upon which to exhibit truth in all its simple beauty? and sift out from the theatrical lore of ages the chaff and folly that has encumbered it? and preserve and profit by that which is truly good and great? This, however, is not the work of a day or a year; but, as the chaff is protective to wheat in a pile, so the true lore of ages is concealed and preserved in the chaff pile of folly and nonsense, until the Saints of the Most High cause a separation. / We shall endeavour to make our theatrical performances a source of good, and not of evil. (Journal of Discourses, [London: Latter-day Saints' Book Depot, 1854-1886], 9: 243.)

Monday, August 24, 2009

Noteworthy Quotes


—▪ Kevin McKendrick: I wish [theatre] played a bigger role [in my community]. Unfortunately the majority of theatre goers attend shows presented by larger theatre companies primarily because they provide diversion and entertainment. My one wish before I die is that theatre is celebrated in our community for more than that—as a place where we go to for inspiration, wisdom, and insight into our daily lives.” \\ Theatre Alberta News, Fall 2008:11

—▪ Sophocles (496-406 BC): I depict men as they ought to be, but Euripides portrays them as they are. \\ from Aristotle’s Poetics, p. 68

—▪ Jan Heather: The project of theatre in all its forms is to humanize. There are many forces at work in this world that isolate and dehumanize us. Theatre is the opposite force …” \\ Theatre Alberta News, Spring 2008:4

—▪ Thomas Moore: Unfortunately, our society has reduced the life of art to entertainment. We don’t need to be entertained nearly as much as we need to give the soul the images [and stories] it craves. Yet we allow Hollywood and the entertainment industry to distract us, to sell us superficial stories with exploitative characters and formulaic plots. \\ “Embracing the Everyday” from Handbook for the Soul, p. 30

—▪ Andre Bazin: The spiritual quality of art suffered its decline at the expense of “realism.” \\ quoted in BYU Studies: Film issue, p. 271

—▪ Dana Gioia: The role of culture must go beyond economics. \\ Commencement address at Sanford U. 17 June 2007

—▪ Story is more than a passing fancy or custom. It is a universal need. … Stories do more than entertain. … Stories in large form help us understand the world, and society, and the culture we struggle to shape. Theatre is the laboratory ideally suited to present and examine those stories. \\ Theatre Alberta News, Summer 2007:14

—▪ Stella Adler: Life beats down and crushes the soul … and art reminds you that you have one.” \\ Theatre Alberta Buzz (online Newsletter) Nov. 2008

—▪ The D’s, Duane Hiatt and Dick Davis: Participants on both sides of the footlights will have to support and demand entertainment that is not only clean but meaningful and well-done. “Mormons and Entertainment,” New Era, Mar. 1974, 12–13

—▪ Keith Engar: The Mormon playwright needs our help as never before if we are to have the benefits of his talent. He needs time to write, he needs a place to write, and he needs a theater in which to produce his plays. I for one am highly optimistic that these needs are going to be met in many different ways, and I hope that ... Church members will be aware of what these needs are and do their part to meet them. “Q&A: Questions and Answers: What has been and what is the role of theater in the Church?” New Era, Sept. 1972, 47 by Dept. of Theater head, Univ. of Utah, YMMIA General Bd.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

A Somewhat Delayed Beginning


In the beginning, I did not intend to start a New Play Forum. I was an emerging writer/playwright (& am still emerging!) (with an LDS religious heritage), who was hoping someone else with gifts in organization, administration, and directing would take up the cause of new play development (NPD). Now, almost 20 years after my first letters pleading for NPD opportunities; after too many rejected proposals; and after reading too many stories of too many playwrights who had to leave their solitudes and do NPD for themselves and others, I have decided to seek support in the cause of NPD for myself and others in the small community where I grew up and where I have just returned this past February. This blog will hopefully detail the progress of this DREAM.

In my belief, there are thousands of scripts that deserve an audience. And thousands of playwrights who need forums where they can explore their solitary visions—places and stages where they can put "flesh and blood" onto the bones of their scripts.

My vision is for a New Play Forum that is not of this world. By that I mean, a Forum where the profit-seeking treadmill of our latter-day acquisitive culture can be countered with a theatre of H.O.P.E.

To give readers a flavor of what has brought me to this place of stepping up to the NPD pulpit, I reproduce here a few of the letters I have sent over the past—nigh—20 years.

Letter of 10 February 1992
To: Administrative Assistant
General Activities Committee [LDS Church]

The purpose of this correspondence is to express some feelings and concerns, and to perhaps give suggestion respecting opportunities for LDS playwrights.

Over the past many years, I have read and re-read the messages to LDS artists from Brigham Young, Orson F. Whitney, John Taylor, Spencer W. Kimball (ENSIGN, July 1977, pp. 2-5), Elder Boyd K. Packer (ENSIGN, August 1976, July 1977, pp. 60-65), and more recently, President Ezra Taft Benson (ENSIGN, Nov. 1998, p. 6); and I have watched as their visions have begun to unfold, particularly with respect to LDS composers and visual artists. Clearly, the establishment of the Museum of Church History and Art has given hope and encouragement to thousands in the expression of their gifts and talents. The goodwill generated in this one building is immeasurable. Yet, there remains one art form (perhaps the most powerful) which continues to struggle in relative isolation. I refer to theatre and specifically to the works of LDS playwrights.

I recognize that unique requirements and risks often make new drama costly to produce and that “draw” is a governing factor. Thus, most community theatres and university theatres like, BYU, as well as LDS Stakes, continually opt for the proven “Broadway” or “off-Broadway” hits or the classics (even when these theatres have sometimes had to omit parts or “re-write” for their conservative audiences). This means that unknown inexperienced LDS playwrights have very few opportunities to develop their talents and to obtain necessary production experience. But we must all begin somewhere and that is what I wish to ask—Is there not some way the Church could encourage the establishment of a privately-funded endowment for the dramatic arts?

I know there are limits to what the Church can and should do, but Church officials perhaps know of persons who could be encouraged to establish an endowment for the Dramatic Arts—with a mission to promote excellence in playwriting within the LDS community.

This private endowment could:
1. Establish awards for playwriting competitions;
2. Fund yearly New Play Festivals (including payment for production rights);
3. Pay compensation to readers, directors, principal actors, and others who (as in summer theatre) are hired for the preparation and term of the Festival (say 3 to 4 months). These principal artists could be students studying in related areas of theatre. This would give them paid employment, valuable experience, and perhaps even university credit in their chosen fields; and
4. Assist in funding the production of qualifying plays in other regions of the world.
There may be more opportunities for LDS playwrights in Utah, but even those, I understand, are not that frequent and are often without financial compensation. Ideally, that is as art (as every occupation) should be—each giving and receiving according to ability and need. But we have yet to reach such perfection, and for those of us who feel it a life-work to write plays, there is no living and little hope for future writing when we cannot meet our needs in the field of our driven-ness. As artists we sometimes feel guilty needing compensation for the years of research and writing that give shape to our creations.

As well, we desire for our work what parents desire for their children—the best possible life. Ofttimes, we do not know even where to obtain help in the first stagings of our work. We see how our local people are committed to jobs, Church, families, politics, community, and other worthy endeavors, so to plead for volunteers for one more time-consuming thing that may garner only a small audience for a short run, is almost beyond our daring—and sometimes beyond our belief that it can be done well in those circumstances. And being performed well is critical to the future life of our work to which we have given our every effort to writing well.

I realize that many new works may not be well-written, but I believe that many others are; and for good LDS playwrights there is great need for opportunity. If, as in our present system, theatres and LDS communities continually choose in favor of classic or Broadway theatre, then the visions of great LDS drama will never come to pass. Granted, classic and Broadway theatre have a vital place, but if more of a balance were attempted between these proven works and new ones, then perhaps great new theatre would result and LDS audience educated toward appreciating new works arising from out of their values and unique heritage. With vision and commitment, we could all play a key role.

There is tremendous power in theatre. I am convinced that LDS playwrights can produce some of the best theatre in the world, but the opportunity to learn and to establish ourselves is critical, and is seldom, if ever, available to us in world theatres. Thus, our persistent hope is three-fold: first, that LDS schools, producers, directors, and the wider LDS community will begin to seek out the works of LDS playwrights; second, that we, as LDS playwrights will improve with opportunity and experience; and third, that we never forget that the history of art is also a history of its patrons. Much of the great music, painting, and drama is with us today only because altruistic men and women gave of their surplus to benefit the world by encouraging and providing venue for the talents of other men and women who felt a drive to create.

Could not the Church foster a new era of great theatre by encouraging philanthropic men and women to establish a private endowment for the advancement and promotion of works written by LDS playwrights?

Sincerely
[SMSmith]

Memo of October 13, 1999
Sent to 10 groups involved in LDS theatre. Most did not reply, but the two or three who did felt they were doing what they could.
--------------------------
To: [List of addressee's follows this letter]
From: [SMSmith] (playwright)
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 1999
Subject: New Play Development

Over seven years ago, I wrote to the Church Activities Committee and to BYU outlining some of the challenges that LDS playwrights face in getting their new works staged and stage-worthy. Since that time it has become more and more apparent that LDS playwriting will never achieve a reputation for excellence until producers, directors, and playwrights are willing to invest in a process that has been integral to theatre, in some form or other, from the beginning—a process that has now evolved into the form called Play Development (referred to hereafter as NPD or New Play Development). Within the LDS community however, NPD opportunities have been, too often, absent or short-circuited. As a result, our theatres continually opt for revivals of Broadway or Off-Broadway productions. And so these world "classics" (that have already been developed over months or years) get recycled endlessly while many potential classics that reflect our values and heritage languish in undeveloped oblivion.

If the words of the Prophets are to be fulfilled concerning the dramatic arts, new LDS works will need latter-day visionaries. We need venues devoted to NPD. This need is underscored by the 350 plus submissions the Church and Promised Valley Productions received in response to a call for script proposals in September 1998. This theatre project by the Church is a thrilling development, but as the Church can accept only 10-15 scripts to develop over the next few years, hundreds of scripts are left without adequate opportunity for NPD. And without access to appropriate venues and expertise, too many LDS playwrights have chosen to skip NPD (perhaps, not even been aware of its necessity) and gone straight to production on a Ward, Stake, or community basis, thus by-passing the vital (and often painful) process designed to perfect plays in association with gifted actors, designers, and directors versed in the NPD process. As a result, many such plays have fallen short of the excellence they might have achieved.

Perhaps some LDS-oriented venues has already taken steps to explore, sponsor, and promote opportunities for New Play Development, but it seems that even theatres with resources suitable for NPD are, themselves, opting for revivals. Thus, I have written this memo—hoping to increase awareness of NPD and of the great need for NPD advocates.

We need people who understand that even “inspired” works seldom spring perfectly whole from the mind of the playwright, but that wholeness is sometimes achieved in the developmental process. We need more people knowledgeable about NPD and committed to supporting it. We need more people who believe that new LDS works deserve, at least, equivalent opportunity for development that the “classics” have received. And we need to trust that audiences will support new works of quality ... because there is an energy surrounding great new plays that even great old plays cannot match.

We need more than the Church and Promised Valley Productions to focus on NPD. We need Tuacahn, BYU, Ricks College, and many other venues to make greater commitment to NPD. We need courses, workshops, and festivals that instruct in the unique and various processes of NPD. We need actors, designers, directors, producers, and playwrights willing to invest in the sometimes long and arduous process required. We need to nurture more works worthy of the name we bear.

Can we put New Play Development higher on our agenda and brainstorm the options we have? Drama is perhaps the most powerful art form available because it accesses all other arts forms and presents this multiplicity of arts, live. Surely new theatre deserves more than we have given it to date.

(An excellent reference is Edward M. Cohen's, Working on a New Play: A Play Development Handbook for Actors, Directors, Designers and Playwrights.)

[List of addressees of the above letter—personal names removed to respect their privacy:]
- The Mormon Arts Foundation: President
- Tuacahn Centre for the Arts: Tuacahn CEO
- Brigham Young University: Chair: Dept. of Theatre & Media Arts
- BYU–Hawaii: Professor of Theatre & Speech
- Ricks College: Dept. Chair: Dept. of Theatre
- Utah Festival Opera Company: General Director
- The Watchmen Institute: President
- SCERA
- Encore Publishing
- Zion East Foundation for the Arts

Letter of 27 July 1999
To: [_____ Foundation (Wealthy Philanthropist): name removed to respect their privacy]

Over seven years ago, I wrote to the Church General Activities Committee about the challenges facing many LDS playwrights. I enclose a copy of my letters for your reference, so you may better understand the purpose of this present correspondence.

As you probably know, the Church is constructing a theatre along with the new Assembly Building. In anticipation of its completion, the Church and Promised Valley Productions issued a call for scripts in the Church News (September 26, 1998) announcing that several contracts would be offered for script development in each of four theme categories. The response was overwhelming—over 350 submissions. The first cut was to 100 from which 10 or 12 will shortly be selected with first productions scheduled for December 2000. This initiative by the Church and Promised Valley Productions is a thrilling development and will bless countless lives because live theatre is possibly the most powerful art form there is.

As I have waited upon the final selection announcement (expected in mid-August), I have pondered upon the many who will be told that their scripts must again wait untold months, even years, for another rare opportunity for script development. The opportunities are rare because: 1) community & college theatres, including BYU, continually opt to do revivals; 2) non-profit theatres that focus on new play development do not seem interested in religious or values-oriented works; and 3) many theatres are not prepared to deal with the intense process that attends new play development (readings, workshops, preview performances, etc.). Thus, the power of excellent, LDS-heritage and value-based theatre remains largely undiscovered. In some cases, where anxious LDS playwrights have proceeded to full production and publication without adequate script development their work has suffered, never achieving the power or appeal it might have enjoyed, had the script been polished in development.

I know your philanthropy must be guided by your own sense of calling to a cause, but the cause of LDS playwright development is in dire need of visionary patrons. The number of submissions received by the Church demonstrates the great need for expanded development opportunities for LDS playwrights who seek to honor their heritage and faith by giving their plays the best birthing possible. For the words of the Prophets to be fulfilled concerning the dramatic arts, LDS playwrights need access to additional centres devoted to new play development. If such a project speaks to your heart (or to others whom you know), your sponsorship could bless the world.

Sincerely,
[SMSmith]

Letter of 15 September 1999
[SMS response to _____ Foundation reply]

Thank you for your reply of 16 August 1999. I recognize that there are limited funds for the many worthy causes that make appeal to the [Name] Foundation, and I appreciate your frankness in explaining the Foundation's present commitments and reservations.

I suppose we playwrights get impatient at times for a more speedy resolution to finding venues and expertise for new play development (NPD). Some of our frustration arises because people forget that their favourite "classic" works have endured weeks/months/years of NPD (or its equivalent) in order to become stage-worthy. People see the "polish" of these developed works and then expect new undeveloped plays to be as stage-worthy at first reading. That is our biggest challenge—to raise awareness about the necessity and process of NPD—to help people understand that great dramatic work is seldom, if ever, born perfectly whole from the head or pen of the playwright, but that great theatre is polished in the collaborative process of NPD.

Undoubtedly, with the Church's new theatre project, the need for NPD opportunities will receive increased attention by members of the Mormon Arts Foundation, by Church Universities/Colleges, and by theatre owners and patrons. It is my contention that we will never have great LDS theatre until we recognize and support the process that creates it.

Again, I thank you for your considerate reply, and hope that at some future date, the [Name] Foundation may have opportunity to support New Play Development.

Sincerely,
[SMSmith]

Letter of 7 January 2004
Church Theatrical Script Submission
50 East North Temple Street, Room 2082
Salt Lake City, UT 84150 USA

Dear Committee:
RE: Call for Scripts, Ensign, January 2004:79

What happened to the scripts and proposals received from a previous script call in 1998? Church News, Sept. 26, 1998:Z10 & Ensign, December 1998:71) The response was overwhelming with over 350 proposals submitted, yet in the past 5 years, it seems that only one project, Savior of the World, has been developed and produced. And now another script call!

As a playwright, I was greatly encouraged when the 1998 script call offered developmental opportunity as part of the process, because too much LDS theater has suffered from the absence of developmental opportunity and from the failure to recognize its importance. We will not achieve excellence without a refining process, yet your recent call seems to ignore both the time & process required to polish new works.

If wards and stakes are expected to polish the work, then playwrights are denied valuable opportunities to refine their craft, not to mention concerns of copyright & script integrity.

New Play Development (NPD) has been a concern of mine for some time. If you wish to know the feelings of a playwright on this matter, I attach copies of correspondence from 1999 and 1992 addressing this issue. I hope you will feel moved to read them.

Sincerely,
[SMSmith]

 
Creative Commons License
MtnView-NewPlayForum blog by SMSmith is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.